An incident was brought on his behalf against him and other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It is believed that this was only done so that the Supreme Court wouldn’t normally hear the full case considering that the Bush Administration will have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to do utilizing the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been charged with lesser and less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated when he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled that he was competent in which he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007).
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to increase it towards the 8th of December, giving the ability into the Federal Bureau of Investigation and many other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our rights that are constitutional. February 28th, 2011 was thought to be the last day of this Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. Using this extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. When it came right down to voting when it comes to extension many Republicans voted for it and Democrats argued against the extension. However, that which was a surprise to numerous was the known fact that sixty-five Democrats voted for the extension associated with Patriot Act. One in particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest ranking democrat on the Intelligence Committee, wish to see this extension all of the way right through to 2013. Many of the 27 Republicans who voted contrary to the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American individuals will face a legitimate danger of out-of-control prosecutions along with the possibility for out-of-control spy networks effect that is taking.
Groups like the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) as well as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform for the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take advantageous asset of the bill and use with this power to trouble innocent members of the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee regarding the dependence on reform regarding the Patriot Act, arguing online homework help that the Government monitoring of communications with no proof is a violation regarding the American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations through the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on more than one occasion to your Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the power of this Patriot Act.
For example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens trying to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the United States are being scrutinized underneath the new requirement system of the Patriot Act. One very high ranking official in the usa Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) managed to make it clear if you can find any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility then they will get disapproval. More government that is stringent and thorough criminal record checks are just another obstacle produced by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also go against all of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that was put in spot to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For online users, it opens the doorway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also place in the center of the arguments are companies and public libraries that need to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, at the request of federal law enforcement agencies, without giving any notification with their customers.
I really believe that particular aspects of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not only from Congress, but also from the Supreme Court. Congress can may play a role by making certain the statutory laws they pass try not to go against the protections promised to Americans within the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments regarding the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to ensure the Constitution is upheld even when it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which can be American citizens. Our laws have made this country what it is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, liberty and property has converted into greed. Terrorist acts against the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, power and money scares them more. The individuals vote to own government representation nevertheless the social people need to be more involved in the decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That will only be done if people get more involved in the process that is political not only be happy with how are you affected.
The expression “land for the free” can be used too generously. The way in which it is currently, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country is short for and deprives us all of your liberties that are civil. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. If the Patriot Act will be kept as law, the folks it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president really should not be the factor that is deciding deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
The History of the Patriot Act actually dates back into the century that is eighteenth different laws placed into place during war time for you to protect the usa.
The protection of our nation could be the highest plus the most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are meant to be into the interest that is best regarding the citizens. After all, the citizens supply the government the power to maintain their welfare and to protect them. Individuals with this level of power sometimes concentrate on the whole without rational and the individual has to pay the price. There must be a limit regarding the power associated with the government, if the nation’s life style, liberty and pursuit of property have been in jeopardy we have to look at the rational the government uses when governing this nation. We cannot as a nation just sit back and accept what is being done. To be able to elicit change, we must remain true and do something positive about it.